DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Cost of Target data breach exceeds $200M so far just for card replacement-related costs for 22M customers

Posted on February 18, 2014 by Dissent

From the Credit Union National Association:

 Financial institutions continue to respond to the massive data breach at Target. According to data collected by the Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) and the Credit Union National Association the costs associated with the Target data breech (sic) exceed $200 million.  CBA estimates the cost of card replacements for its members to have reached $172 million, up from an initial finding of $153 million, CUNA has stated the cost to credit unions has increased to $30.6 million from an original estimate of $25 million.

So far, cards replaced by CBA members and credit unions account for more than half of all affected cards. Between members of the Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) and the Credit Union National Association (CUNA), 21.8 million of the 40 million compromised cards have been replaced. This represents 54.5 percent of the cards Target has revealed to have been compromised due to the December data breach.

“Financial institutions of all sizes have been aggressive in ensuring their customers are protected in response to the Target data breach. CBA’s members have proactively replaced cards, increased fraud monitoring efforts and have expanded call center hours. Consumers should rest assured, our members are taking every step to minimize the impact of this massive breach,” said Richard Hunt, president and CEO of the CBA.

“Credit unions have replaced or will replace 85% of their cards affected by the Target breach at no cost to their members,” said Bill Cheney, president and CEO of CUNA. “The combined $200 million cost borne entirely by banks and credit unions shows the extent to which financial institutions will go to protect their customers and members.”

The combined $200 million cost does not factor in costs to financial institutions other than credit unions or members of the CBA, nor does it take into account any fraudulent activity which may have occurred or may occur in the future. Fraudulent activity would push the cost of the Target data breach to the industry much higher, as consumers would not be held liable.


Related:

  • The 4TB time bomb: when EY's cloud went public (and what it taught us)
  • Some lower-tier ransomware gangs have formed a new RaaS alliance -- or have they? (1)
  • How a hacking gang held Italy’s political elites to ransom
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackMalware

Post navigation

← Hackers Show They’ve Stolen 828 Gb of Data from Systems of Las Vegas Sands
WEDI publishes health data breach notification tips →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.