DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

IN: St. Vincent Medical Group notifies patients after successful phishing attempt compromises PHI

Posted on April 22, 2015 by Dissent

St. Vincent Medical Group in Indiana, a member of Ascension Health, has provided a substitute notice following an e-mail phishing incident.

According to their notice, a copy of which is posted on their web site, on December 3, 2014, they learned that an employee’s user name and password had been compromised as a result of e-mail phishing. St.Vincent Medical Group immediately shut down the user name and password of the impacted account and launched an investigation into the matter.

Following a manual and electronic investigation of the affected e-mail account, on March 12, 2015, they determined that the account’s e-mails contained some protected health information for approximately 760 patients.

The information in the e-mail account included the patient’s name, demographic information such as date of birth and phone number, account numbers, limited clinical information related to services the patient had received and, in some cases, social security numbers. The hackers did not gain access to individual medical records or billing records, St. Vincent said.

Identity monitoring and protection services are being offered free of charge to those whose social security number has been affected by the incident, staff are being provided additional training on avoiding phishing, and St. Vincent Medical Group is working with its e-mail service provider to consider additional measure to harden security.

In its statement, the medical group writes:

St.Vincent Medical Group sincerely apologizes for any inconvenience this unfortunate incident may cause and assures all of its patients that the faith-based organization is taking appropriate measures to avoid an incident of this nature happening in the future.

I have no idea why they felt the need to include “faith-based” as a description. Are they subtly asking their patients to have faith in them? Or is this, “Don’t be too angry at us, please, because RELIGION?”

This is not St. Vincent’s first reported breach. Previously disclosed incidents, reported on PHIprivacy.net, include a mailing error affecting 63,000 Breast Center patients, a laptop reported stolen from St. Vincent Hospital that contained PHI on 1,100 patients, and a previous breach of associate e-mail accounts that held PHI of 1,800 St. Vincent Indianapolis Hospital patients,

Obviously, being faith-based does not protect from data security breaches, no matter how much faith you have.


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • British institutions to be banned from paying ransoms to Russian hackers
  • Data breach feared after cyberattack on AMEOS hospitals in Germany
  • Michigan ‘ATM jackpotting’: Florida men allegedly forced machines to dispense $107K
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Authorities released free decryptor for Phobos and 8base ransomware
Category: Health DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Dem: USIS data breach affected more than 27K
Intuit lawsuit alleges firm facilitated fraud by lax security →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Honeywell vulnerability exposes building systems to cyber attacks
  • Recent public service announcements of note — parents should take special note of these
  • Au: Junior doctor faces fresh toilet spying charges as probe widens to other major hospitals
  • Average Brit hit by five data breaches since 2004
  • BlackSuit ransomware site seized as part of Operation Checkmate
  • The day after XSS.is forum was seized, it struggles to come back online — but is it really them?
  • U.S. nuclear and health agencies hit in Microsoft SharePoint breach
  • Russia suspected of hacking Dutch prosecution service systems
  • Korea imposes 343 million won penalty on HAESUNG DS for data breach of 70,000 shareholders
  • Paying cyberattackers is wrong, right? Should Taos County’s incident be an exception? (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure
  • Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals
  • As companies race to add AI, terms of service changes are going to freak a lot of people out. Think twice before granting consent!
  • Uganda orders Google to register as a data-controller within 30 days after landmark privacy ruling

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.