DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

INFORMATION SECURITY: Additional Actions Needed to Address Vulnerabilities That Put VA Data at Risk – GAO

Posted on November 18, 2014 by Dissent

Highlights of a new GAO study also addressing VA infosecurity:

What GAO Found

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has taken actions to mitigate previously identified vulnerabilities, but it has not fully addressed these weaknesses:

Incident response: VA took actions to contain and eradicate the effects of a network intrusion detected in 2012, but it could not show that these actions were fully effective. Specifically, the department’s Network and Security Operations Center (NSOC) analyzed the incident and documented actions taken in response, but the department could not provide forensics analysis or digital evidence associated with its efforts. Thus, the effectiveness of its incident response could not be demonstrated. VA policy does not require evidence related to security incidents to be kept for at least 3 years, as recommended by federal guidance. This hinders the department’s ability to show its efforts have been effective. Further, VA did not fully address the vulnerability that led to the original incident, increasing the risk that such an incident may recur. In addition, VA policy does not provide the NSOC with sufficient authority to monitor activity on the department’s networks, limiting its ability to detect and respond to security incidents.

Vulnerabilities in web applications: VA’s NSOC identified nine significant vulnerabilities in two key applications that process veterans’ personal information, and validated that the department had corrected six of them. However, corrective actions for the remaining three vulnerabilities had not been validated, and the department had not developed action plans to ensure they were addressed in a timely manner. VA also did not fully implement a type of testing that can identify root causes of security vulnerabilities in application source code.

Weaknesses on network devices: VA periodically scans the devices (e.g., laptop computers) connected to its network for security vulnerabilities and summarizes the most critical vulnerabilities. For May 2014, the 10 most critical vulnerabilities were related to security patches that had not been applied to VA’s network devices. These missing patches had been available for periods ranging from 4 to 31 months, even though department policy requires critical patches to be applied within 30 days. While the department documented decisions not to apply 3 of the patches, pending tests of the effect they could have on functionality, it did not document controls to compensate for not applying up-to-date security features. Further, the department did not document any reasons for not applying the other 7 patches. The department has established an organization tasked with remediating security vulnerabilities, but it has not developed specific actions, priorities, and milestones for this organization to carry out its responsibilities.

Until VA fully addresses identified security weaknesses, its systems and the information they contain—including veterans’ personal information—will be at an increased risk of unauthorized access, modification, disclosure, or loss.

GAO-15-220T (full report, pdf)

Related: INFORMATION SECURITY: VA Needs to Address Identified Vulnerabilities – GAO (GAO-15-117)


Related:

  • Canadian woman stuck since 2021 in Mauritius after passport withheld
  • ‘People have had to move house’: Inside the British Library, two years on from devastating cyber attack
  • Two years after an audit highlighted significant concerns, North Salem Central School District leaves sensitive student data at risk
  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • How many courts have had sealed and sensitive files exposed by one vendor's error?
  • Legal Aid Agency chief admits difficulties understanding impact of cyberattack
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesGovernment Sector

Post navigation

← Hackers went after Detroit database, official
The Evolution Store updates its breach notification →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.