DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Judge Refuses to Dismiss Neiman Marcus Data Breach Class Action

Posted on January 30, 2016 by Dissent

Christina Davis reports:

Neiman Marcus Group LLC has lost a bid to toss a class action alleging that the retail clothing chain’s negligence caused a massive data security breach and then hid the problem right before the holiday shopping season in 2013.

The Neiman Marcus class action lawsuit was filed by Hilary Remijas on behalf of consumers affected by the alleged breach.

The Neiman Marcus data breach class action lawsuit had landed back in district court after a somewhat surprising – but welcome – Seventh Circuit ruling reinstated the lawsuit in July, 2015. The court subsequently denied Neiman Marcus’s request for an en banc review of the ruling.  Now back in district court, the retailer argued that the claims should still be dismissed because the injuries did not demonstrate negligence. As Davis reports:

The plaintiffs contended, in turn, that the Seventh Circuit had found that whether or not Neiman Marcus consumers had been reimbursed by their financial institutions for charges resulting from the data breach was factual and could not be dismissed. Additionally, the plaintiffs pointed out that at a minimum, the proposed class had claims based on the amount of time spent dealing with potentially fraudulent charges.

Judge Zagel agreed with the plaintiffs and refused to dismiss the Neiman Marcus class action lawsuit. Judge Zagel stated that dismissal of the lawsuit was “not appropriate at this time.”

So this hasn’t been a great month for Neiman Marcus, who just disclosed this week that they experienced another breach on December 26, 2015 that impacted over 700 California residents (and an unknown total number of consumers).

Neiman Marcus reported that the websites of their Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Horchow, Last Call, and CUSP stores were hit with automated attacks trying various login combinations. The firm suspects that the attackers may have been using login credentials acquired in other hacks of other entities. In some cases, the attackers were able to access customer accounts (but not full credit card numbers or PIN numbers) and make purchases. Neiman Marcus has credited/restored all accounts. Neiman Marcus reports that its defenses were able to successfully repel about 99% of the attacks.


Related:

  • PowerSchool commits to strengthened breach measures following engagement with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • Global hack on Microsoft product hits U.S., state agencies, researchers say
  • Michigan ‘ATM jackpotting’: Florida men allegedly forced machines to dispense $107K
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Bitcoin holds steady as hackers drain over $40 million from CoinCDX, India's top exchange
Category: Business SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← LA: Medicaid fraud case had 13k victims (UPDATED)
Wayne Memorial Hospital fired nurse’s aide who accessed patient records without authorization →

1 thought on “Judge Refuses to Dismiss Neiman Marcus Data Breach Class Action”

  1. adam silber says:
    February 4, 2016 at 1:56 am

    karen katz shouldve already resigned..first CEO with 2 data breaches accomplished..Sad. clearly this retailer cant be trusted permanently. The company is so in debt it had to take an emergency loan as well

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • BreachForums — the one that went offline in April — reappears with a new founder/owner
  • Fans React After NASCAR Confirms Ransomware Breach
  • Allianz Life says ‘majority’ of customers’ personal data stolen in cyberattack
  • Infinite Services notifying employees and patients of limited ransomware attack
  • The safe place for women to talk wasn’t so safe: hackers leak 13,000 user photos and IDs from the Tea app
  • Au: Qantas hackers gave airline 72-hour deadline
  • Honeywell vulnerability exposes building systems to cyber attacks
  • Recent public service announcements of note — parents should take special note of these
  • Au: Junior doctor faces fresh toilet spying charges as probe widens to other major hospitals
  • Average Brit hit by five data breaches since 2004

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure
  • Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.