DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

21st Century Oncology settlement with HHS over 2015 data breach came with a $2.3 million price tag

Posted on December 15, 2017 by Dissent

There’s an update or follow-up to a breach involving 21st Century Oncology that was first reported on this site in March 2016. The breach, which they first learned of in November 2015 when federal agents contacted them, was the second breach in as many years that the entity had neither prevented nor discovered under its own means.  The 2013 incident involved a rogue employee, while the 2015 incident appeared to involve  a hack. Both compromised patient information.

The 2015 breach resulted in numerous lawsuits and couldn’t have occurred at a worse time, as the entity was in the process of finalizing a $19.75 million settlement with the government under the False Claim Acts.  There was also an announcement this week of a $26 million settlement under the False Claim Acts.

This week, FierceHealthcare broke the news that 21st Century Oncology had reached a $2.3 million settlement with OCR over the 2015 breach.  Although HHS has not issued a press release about this settlement, HHS’s findings from its investigation are incorporated in the court filing as an exhibit. Those findings include:

A. 21CO impermissibly disclosed certain PHI of 2,213,597 of its patients. See 45 C.F.R. § 164.502(a);

B. 21CO failed to conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of theelectronic protected health information (ePHI) held by 21CO. See 45 C.F.R. § 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A);

C. 21CO failed to implement certain security measures sufficient to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable and appropriate level to comply with 45 C.F.R. § 164.306(A). See 45 C.F.R. § 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B);

D. 21CO failed to implement procedures to regularly review records of information system activity, such as audit logs, access reports, and security incident tracking reports. See 45 C.F.R. §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D);

E. 21CO disclosed protected health information to a third party vendors, acting as its business associates, without obtaining satisfactory assurances in the form of a written business associate agreement. See 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.502(e) and 164.308(b)(3).


Related:

  • Massive Great Firewall Leak Exposes 500GB of Censorship Data
  • UK: Woman charged after NHS patients' records accessed in data breach
  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • How many courts have had sealed and sensitive files exposed by one vendor's error?
  • Ukrainian Conti Ransomware Suspect Extradited to US from Ireland
  • Legal Aid Agency chief admits difficulties understanding impact of cyberattack
Category: HackHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Proctor schools hit by ransomware attack
Researcher claims LinkedIn ignored security flaw, but did they? →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Once a Patient’s in Custody, ICE Can Be at Hospital Bedsides — But Detainees Have Rights
  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.