DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

DOCS Medical Group discloses September ransomware incident

Posted on November 22, 2022 by Dissent

DOCS Medical Group is an urgent care and primary care provider in Connecticut with multiple locations. They also provide telemedicine services.

On September 7, DOCS detected abnormal activity that was quickly identified as a ransomware attack.

According to their notification letter to patients dated November 7, an unspecified number of patients had their information on a server that had been targeted. The information included demographic information (e.g. name and contact information), medical history, reasons for visiting DOCS Medical Group, Social Security number, insurance information, and various types of financial information. DOCS accepts health insurance and also has its own UR Health plan that patients can subscribe to.

The ransomware attack reportedly did not affect electronic medical records or billing systems, and DOCS Medical Group was “fully operational at all times.”

The notification does not indicate what ransomware group hit the practice, whether files were locked, and if they were locked, whether DOCS was able to decrypt them or restore them from backup. Nor does the notification indicate whether any ransom demand was received and if it was, whether DOCS engaged with the threat actors at all or paid them.

But perhaps one of the most intriguing statements in the notification was this: “The ransomware attack did not occur due to any act or omission of DOCS or its staff.”

So then how did the threat actors gain access?

Later in the notice, they state: “DOCS takes its obligation to protect the privacy and  confidentiality of our patients’ personal information and we expect our vendors to do the same.” Why were vendors mentioned here? Was this breach related to a vendor in any way? Is that why they said the attack did not occur due to any act or omission of DOCS or its staff?

DataBreaches sent an email to DOCS Medical Group yesterday asking for more details about the ransomware attack and for an explanation of certain statements in their notification.  No reply has been received as yet, and the incident does not yet appear on HHS’s public breach tool.  This post will be updated when more information becomes available.


Related:

  • Qantas obtains injunction to prevent hacked data’s release
  • Ransomware attack disrupts Korea's largest guarantee insurer
  • Theft from Glasgow’s Queen Elizabeth University Hospital sparks probe
  • Global operation targets NoName057(16) pro-Russian cybercrime network in Operation Eastwood
  • More than 100 British government personnel exposed by Ministry of Defence data leak
  • New TeleMessage SGNL Flaw Is Actively Being Exploited by Attackers
Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← The LinkedIn-HiQ Labs Case and Data Scraping in the US: Some Takeaways
Doctors Center Hospital reports 1.2 million patients affected by ransomware attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hungarian police arrest suspect in cyberattacks on independent media
  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • British institutions to be banned from paying ransoms to Russian hackers
  • Data breach feared after cyberattack on AMEOS hospitals in Germany
  • Microsoft Releases Urgent Patch for SharePoint RCE Flaw Exploited in Ongoing Cyber Attacks
  • Global hack on Microsoft product hits U.S., state agencies, researchers say
  • Inquiry launched after identities of SAS soldiers leaked in fresh data breach
  • UK sanctions Russian cyber spies accused of facilitating murders
  • Michigan ‘ATM jackpotting’: Florida men allegedly forced machines to dispense $107K
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure
  • Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals
  • As companies race to add AI, terms of service changes are going to freak a lot of people out. Think twice before granting consent!
  • Uganda orders Google to register as a data-controller within 30 days after landmark privacy ruling
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg reach settlement to end $8 billion trial over Facebook privacy violations
  • ICE is gaining access to trove of Medicaid records, adding new peril for immigrants
  • Microsoft can’t protect French data from US government access

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.