DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

If you pay ransom, you may not get your data back and worse, you probably WILL get hit again – Cybereason Survey

Posted on February 23, 2024 by Dissent

Ever since ransomware attacks and “double extortion” attacks became common, law enforcement has urged victims not to pay ransom demands. Paying criminals ransom only encourages them to attack more victims, and despite criminals swearing they will delete their copy of your data that they stole, they don’t. Then, too, once you show them that you are willing to pay, you’ve made yourself more likely to be hit again.

This week, law enforcement reiterated some of the above when the NCA reported that in seizing LockBit servers, they found data from victims who had paid the ransom demands and who had been assured their data would be destroyed.

Shocking news that criminals lie, right? But here are some new findings that will hopefully give future victims serious pause before thinking about paying any ransom demands. Emma Woollacott reports:

Almost eight-in-ten organizations that met ransomware demands in the last two years were hit a second time, according to new research from Cybereason.

Analysis from the security firm found that 56% of organizations suffered more than one ransomware attack in the last 24 months, and nearly two-thirds (63%) were asked to pay again.

Meanwhile, of the organizations that chose to pay a ransom in return for their encrypted systems, only 47% actually got their data and solutions back uncorrupted.

Access Cybereason’s report, Ransomware: The True Cost, on their website. In the meantime, take a look at this one graphic from their report:

Source: RANSOMWARE: True Cost. Cybereason, 2024.

Their results indicated that 82% of those who paid ransom were breached again within a year. 36% of them were breached by the same actor, and 42% by a different actor. And the second time around, 63% of these were asked to pay more the second time.

Cybereason concludes that it’s time to reject the ransom. The data certainly supports that.


Related:

  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Scenes from a "No Kings" Protest, 10-18-25
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesOf Note

Post navigation

← An Update on the SEC’s Cybersecurity Reporting Rules
True or false, Friday law enforcement edition →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Once a Patient’s in Custody, ICE Can Be at Hospital Bedsides — But Detainees Have Rights
  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.