DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

LinkedIn vulnerability to MITM attacks puts your data at risk – Zimperium

Posted on June 19, 2014 by Dissent

Zimperium Mobile Defence says that their testing found that LinkedIn users are at risk of Man-in-the-Middle Attacks:

What information is vulnerable?
Using basic MITM, we found that an attacker can extract a LinkedIn user’s credentials, hijack their session to gain access to all other LinkedIn information and impersonate the user. The following information is exposed, along with anything else that you, as a user, have access to:

  • Email address
  • Password
  • Read and Sent Messages
  • Connections
  • “Who viewed my profile”

Attackers can impersonate the user to use any account feature, including:

  • Send invitations to connect
  • Edit the user’s profile
  • Edit job postings
  • Manage company pages

So not only is your personal LinkedIn information at risk, but also if you are an administrator for your corporate LinkedIn presence, your company’s brand reputation could also be damaged if a malicious actor were to gain control over posts and email communication on LinkedIn.

Who is vulnerable?

Every single user we tested was vulnerable to this attack. In addition, this vulnerability doesn’t just exist when an attacker is on the same network as the target – if an attacker has already compromised a device, once that device enters a different network, the attacker can use the victim’s device to attack other users on the same network.

Zimperium writes that they did notify LinkedIn of the vulnerability, and since May 2013, had reached out numerous times to LinkedIn. According to their statement, LinkedIn informed them that they were planning to turn on SSL by default, but it has not happened yet.

DataBreaches.net e-mailed LinkedIn for a response to Zimperium’s claims, and they provided this statement:

LinkedIn is committed to protecting the security of our members. In December 2013,  we started transitioning the LinkedIn site to default HTTPS and just last week announced that we are serving all traffic to all users in US and EU by default over HTTPS. This issue does not impact the vast majority of LinkedIn members given our ongoing global release of HTTPS by default.

LinkedIn also noted that when contacted by the researchers, they responded by sharing updates on their blog about their HTTPS rollout which address the issue. In addition, their spokesperson notes, members have been able to turn on HTTPS by default by simply going to their settings, clicking the Account tab and then clicking manage security settings and checking the box and clicking “save changes”. At any time, they can turn off HTTPS by unchecking the box.

If you are not in the U.S. or EU and use LinkedIn, you might want to check to ensure you’ve enabled HTTPS by default.

 


Related:

  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Scenes from a "No Kings" Protest, 10-18-25
  • No Kings. Not Today. Not Ever.
Category: Business SectorCommentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← AT&T Mobility reports breach involving service provider employees
House Oversight asks Inspector General of the FTC to investigate FTC’s actions in LabMD case →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • Eurofiber admits crooks swiped data from French unit after cyberattack
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • French agency Pajemploi reports data breach affecting 1.2M people
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (1)
  • Surveillance tech provider Protei was hacked, its data stolen, and its website defaced
  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • Keeping Cool When ICE Arrives: Basic Raid Response Strategies for Laboratories
  • IRS Accessed Massive Database of Americans Flights Without a Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.