DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

More details emerge on Department of Homeland Security breach affecting more than 247,000 employees and non-employees

Posted on January 4, 2018 by Dissent
Image credit: Dreamstime

If you were part of a Department of Homeland Security Office of the Inspector General investigation at some time between 2002 through 2014, DHS wants you to know that you may be a breach victim. Unfortunately, due to “technological” issues, it seems that DHS can’t directly contact you to alert you, so read on…..

A few more details have emerged in the matter of a breach involving the Department of Homeland Security.  The breach, which involved the May discovery of an unauthorized copy of DHS’s investigative case management system in the possession of a former DHS OIG employee, was first reported in November by USA Today

Joseph Marks reports that the Inspector General has now confirmed that the breach affected more approximately 247,167  DHS employees, but DHS has now also revealed that the breach impacted non-employees who contacted or interacted with the department:  “individuals (i.e., subjects, witnesses, and complainants) associated with DHS OIG investigations from 2002 through 2014 (the “Investigative Data”).”

DHS’s statement can be found on their site. Of note, DHS writes:

The privacy incident did not stem from a cyber-attack by external actors, and the evidence indicates that affected individual’s personal information was not the primary target of the unauthorized exfiltration.

Affected individuals are being offered 18 months of free credit monitoring and identity protection services.

But of course, there are lots of raised eyebrows that the agency responsible for protecting  our homeland from terrorist attacks and the like had an insider breach that went unprevented and undetected until May of this year. In response to the incident, DHS notes:

The Department of Homeland Security takes very seriously the obligation to serve the Department’s employees and is committed to protecting the information in which they are entrusted. Please be assured that we will make every effort to ensure this does not happen again.  DHS is implementing additional security precautions to limit which individuals have access to this information and will better identify unusual access patterns. We will continue to review our systems and practices in order to better secure data. DHS OIG has also implemented a number of security precautions to further secure the DHS OIG network.

Will their changes also enable them to identify and notify any non-employees who might get caught up in any future breaches? Shouldn’t the agency have some way of doing that unless someone was a confidential witness who did not provide their real details in dealing with the agency – or something like that?


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • Inquiry launched after identities of SAS soldiers leaked in fresh data breach
  • Michigan ‘ATM jackpotting’: Florida men allegedly forced machines to dispense $107K
  • Government will 'robustly defend' compensation claims from Afghans put at risk by data breach
  • Missouri Adopts New Data Breach Notice Law
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
Category: Government SectorInsiderU.S.

Post navigation

← Shafer’s attorney files motion to dismiss federal charges of cyberstalking an FBI agent’s family and court personnel
German Health Ministry lobbyist data theft trial begin →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Au: Qantas hackers gave airline 72-hour deadline
  • Honeywell vulnerability exposes building systems to cyber attacks
  • Recent public service announcements of note — parents should take special note of these
  • Au: Junior doctor faces fresh toilet spying charges as probe widens to other major hospitals
  • Average Brit hit by five data breaches since 2004
  • BlackSuit ransomware site seized as part of Operation Checkmate
  • The day after XSS.is forum was seized, it struggles to come back online — but is it really them?
  • U.S. nuclear and health agencies hit in Microsoft SharePoint breach
  • Russia suspected of hacking Dutch prosecution service systems
  • Korea imposes 343 million won penalty on HAESUNG DS for data breach of 70,000 shareholders

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure
  • Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals
  • As companies race to add AI, terms of service changes are going to freak a lot of people out. Think twice before granting consent!
  • Uganda orders Google to register as a data-controller within 30 days after landmark privacy ruling

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.