DataBreaches.net

DataBreaches.net

The Office of Inadequate Security

Menu
  • Breach Laws
  • About
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Transparency Reports
Menu

OH: Potential class action against Health Recovery Services survives motion to dismiss

Posted on October 16, 2020October 16, 2020 by Dissent

In April 2019, this site reported on a breach disclosed by Health Recovery Services (HRS). In October, 2019, Troy Foster sued them over the breach. I noted at the time that I was surprised at the claim concerning delayed notification when he had been notified in 60 days. I was not surprised to now read that the court dismissed that claim for failure to show that there was an incremental harm associated with any delay.

In any event, HRS moved to dismiss Foster’s complaint on a number of grounds, including, of course, an argument that Foster lacked standing. A summary from the court’s opinion provides a good recap:

Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff has not suffered an injury in fact. Defendant argues that Plaintiff has failed to: (1) allege that he suffered any harm resulting from a delayed notification; (2) to allege that his information was actually stolen or that he has suffered any injury; and (3) to allege that he actually provided sensitive health information about himself to HRS. (ECF No. 9 at 6-10). Plaintiff argues he has standing to bring his claims personally and on behalf of a class and that he has sufficiently alleged the threat of a substantial risk of harm. (ECF No.15 at 3-4).

One of the most interesting parts of the opinion on standing concerned the disclosure of sensitive medical information to a third party constituting a violation of FCRA and hence, an invasion of privacy that constitutes an alleged injury:

This Court finds the Third Circuit’s reasoning in Horizon persuasive. The disclosure of plaintiff’s sensitive medical information to a third party—even where, as here, that third party is a hacker— constitutes an invasion of privacy, the very type of injury that Congress enacted the FCRA to remedy. While Defendant argues that “one cannot infer from mere access … that Plaintiff’s information was accessed, then stolen,” Defendant has provided no evidence to support this assertion and indeed acknowledges in the data breach notice that it is “unable to definitively rule out” the possibility that patient information was accessed or stolen. (ECF No. 9-1 at 2). Defendant has failed to provide factual evidence that would definitively disprove Plaintiff’s allegation of injury. Accordingly, in addition to stating an injury in fact by alleging emotional distress, Plaintiff has also alleged an Article III injury by pleading a violation of the FCRA through the disclosure of his sensitive medical information to a third party.

When all was said and done, the court denied the motion to dismiss in part and granted it in part.  But the case survived and has a long way to go.

Foster v. Health Recovery Services
Case No. 2:19-CV-4453
United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

Opinion

Thanks to @JohnBrownnjr for alerting me to the opinion.

Related Posts:

  • VT: DCF email inadvertently shares foster parents'…
  • Athens man sues local health agency for data breach
  • Intermedix data breach class action case dismissed
  • First data breach case granted standing in Pennsylvania
  • Northern District of Illinois Foreshadows Tough…

Post navigation

← GAO: DATA SECURITY: Recent K-12 Data Breaches Show That Students Are Vulnerable to Harm
Cosmote reveals cyber attack exposed telephone data from thousands of customers →

Sponsored or Paid Posts

This site doesn’t accept sponsored posts and doesn’t respond to requests about them.

Have a News Tip?

Email:

Breaches[at]Protonmail.ch
Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Telegram: @DissentDoe

Browse by News Section

Latest Posts

  • Cybersecurity: Federal Agencies Made Progress, but Need to Fully Implement Incident Response Requirements (GAO Report)
  • Hackers Exploited ColdFusion Vulnerability to Breach Federal Agency Servers
  • CBIZ KA Notice of Data Privacy Incident (Prime Healthcare)
  • Seeking clarification on Maine’s data breach notification statute
  • East River Medical Imaging notifies 605,809 patients of breach
  • Russian hackers exploiting Outlook bug to hijack Exchange accounts
  • Britain dismisses report claiming Sellafield nuclear site hacking, says no malware exists on our system
  • 23andMe data breach: Hackers accessed data of 6.9 million users

Please Donate

If you can, please donate XMR to our Monero wallet because the entities whose breaches we expose are definitely not supporting our work and are generally trying to chill our speech!

Donate- Scan QR Code   Donate!

Social Media

Find me on Infosec.Exchange.

I am also on Telegram @DissentDoe.

RSS

Grab the RSS Feed

Copyright

© 2009 – 2023, DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.

HIGH PRAISE, INDEED!

“You translate “Nerd” into understandable “English” — Victor Gevers of GDI Foundation, talking about DataBreaches.net

©2023 DataBreaches.net