DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ransomware Threat Actors Dump Data on Clark County School District Employees and Students

Posted on September 28, 2020 by Dissent

Tawnell D. Hobbs reports:

A hacker published documents containing Social Security numbers, student grades and other private information stolen from a large public-school district in Las Vegas after officials refused a ransom demanded in return for unlocking district computer servers.

The illegal release late last week of sensitive information from the Clark County School District in Las Vegas, with about 320,000 students, demonstrates an escalation in tactics for hackers who have taken advantage of schools heavily reliant on online learning and technology to run operations during the coronavirus pandemic.

Some of WSJ’s reporting may alarm employees and parents, so let’s dig into this one a bit more.

WSJ cites Brett Callow of Emisoft, who examined the latest data dump and informed WSJ that in its second dump, the hacker(s) uploaded files of a more sensitive nature, including employee Social Security numbers, addresses and retirement paperwork. For students, information released included a data file with names, grades, birth dates, addresses and the school attended.

What the CCSD attackers got — assuming for the moment that they really did dump everything they got and aren’t hanging on to some of it to sell it or misuse it — is nowhere near even a small amount of the personal and sensitive information that the district has almost certainly collected and stored on employees and students. Yes, there is some employee personally identifiable information like SSN and rates, and I don’t mean to minimize the risk of that data being dumped. But what got dumped does not include W-2 files or other personnel records. Nor are any of the truly sensitive student files in the data dump. The attackers may not have gotten the most sensitive files on employees or students. Which brings me to my next point:

A lot of the student data that was dumped is not sensitive information, although those who are not familiar with data protection of student data in the U.S. may understandably describe it as such.  Districts are allowed to make certain types of student information publicly available as “directory information” under the federal law that protects the privacy of education records (FERPA).  Districts get to decide what types of data they will consider “directory information” and publicly available. According to CCSD’s definition of “Directory Information,” all of the following can be made public by the district without the consent of the students or parents:

the student’s name, address, grade level, date and place of birth, participation in officially recognized activities and sports, weight and height if a member of an athletic team, years of attendance, degrees and awards received, and schools attended.

In light of the above, revealing some of the students’ data that was exposed would be or is a breach of  the student’s privacy of education records, but students’ names, grade levels, birth dates, and schools attended are not considered sensitive or protected information, however upsetting it may to be parents to hear about a breach. And in a “it could be worse” vein, I would point out that in going through the data, I have not seen any really sensitive student information so far — no student medical records, no student disciplinary records, no social work or psychological  records, and no special education assessments or records.

So was this a bad breach? Yes.  It interrupted functioning of the district and took up resources that could have been better spent on other things.  Are employees at some risk from the dumping of their data? Yes.  Are the students?  Not so much, unless some student’s family was trying to escape location by an abusive family member.

Each attack is different and each district may have different preparation for a breach and ability to recover from one. But let’s not assume that attackers have always gotten the sensitive data, because they may not have.  That said, it’s clear that all districts need to be proactive in trying to prevent attackers from gaining any foothold, and in detecting them quickly before they can exfiltrate data or trigger the release of ransomware.

This post was edited post-publication for clarity purposes.


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • British institutions to be banned from paying ransoms to Russian hackers
  • Microsoft Releases Urgent Patch for SharePoint RCE Flaw Exploited in Ongoing Cyber Attacks
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Authorities released free decryptor for Phobos and 8base ransomware
  • Missouri Adopts New Data Breach Notice Law
Category: Breach IncidentsEducation SectorMalware

Post navigation

← Fr: CMA CGM confirms ransomware attack
No, Netwalker didn’t attack Chubb Insurance — or Chubb Fire and Security →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • IVF provider Genea notifies patients about the cyberattack earlier this year.
  • Key figure behind major Russian-speaking cybercrime forum targeted in Ukraine
  • Clorox Files $380M Suit Alleging Cognizant Gave Hackers Passwords in Catastrophic 2023 Cyberattack
  • Cyberattacks Paralyze Major Russian Restaurant Chains
  • France Travail: At least 340,000 job seekers victims of new hack
  • Legal Silence and Chilling Effects: Injunctions Against the Press in Cybersecurity
  • #StopRansomware: Interlock
  • Suspected XSS Forum Admin Arrested in Ukraine
  • PowerSchool commits to strengthened breach measures following engagement with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  • Hungarian police arrest suspect in cyberattacks on independent media

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure
  • Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals
  • As companies race to add AI, terms of service changes are going to freak a lot of people out. Think twice before granting consent!
  • Uganda orders Google to register as a data-controller within 30 days after landmark privacy ruling
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg reach settlement to end $8 billion trial over Facebook privacy violations

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.