DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

SunCrypt ransomware group swears off medical entities, sets sights on cybersecurity firms

Posted on September 30, 2020 by Dissent

When the SunCrypt ransomware group opened a leak site where they listed victims who had not paid their ransom demands, they attracted public attention and demonstrated their ability to use the media to their advantage. BleepingComputer reported that SunCrypt operators had reached out to them to introduce themselves as part of the Maze cartel. Days later, BleepingComputer had to update their article with a statement that Maze had denied that SunCrypt was part of their cartel. Was SunCrypt or wasn’t SunCrypt part of the cartel? Although there was some evidence to suggest that they were, Maze’s firm denial left It all in doubt. What wasn’t in doubt, however, was that it was clear that SunCrypt was capable of doing significant harm to victims.

In following up on their previously disclosed victims and leaks, DataBreaches.net noticed that a medical entity who had been listed on SunCrypt’s site no longer appeared on it. Knowing that the threat actors probably would not say why the victim’s name had been removed, DataBreaches.net sent them an inquiry anyway.

Their response was somewhat surprising. Although they wouldn’t comment on the medical entity at all, when asked if they would consider not attacking medical entities going forward, their spokesperson immediately responded, “Already done.”  And they wanted us to know that even when they had attacked a medical entity in the past, they had carefully avoided ever locking up life support systems or interfering with any hospital operations.

“We were aiming for the data,” the spokesperson stated, adding,

We don’t play with people’s lives.  And no further attacks will be carried against medical organizations even in this soft way.

SunCrypt hopes other ransomware groups will follow their model on that, but notes that their commitment not to attack medical entities does not extend to all pharmaceutical companies. It’s an issue that they are still debating because there are “lots of pros and cons.” Although they will not attack companies involved in COVID-19 research or treatment, companies that are part of the beauty industry and that do animal testing might be targeted, the spokesperson explained, although it’s still under consideration.

So SunCrypt pledges to leave medical entities alone, and DataBreaches.net hopes they stick to their pledge on that. But who will be they be focusing on, then?  According to the spokesperson, “Suncrypt is after the cybersecurity companies,” and they say we will all be seeing proof of that very soon.

As to the conflicting claims about their participation in the Maze cartel, the spokesperson would not comment on any previous affairs but stated that at the moment, SunCrypt is not a part of any cartel or ransomware group.


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • British institutions to be banned from paying ransoms to Russian hackers
  • Microsoft Releases Urgent Patch for SharePoint RCE Flaw Exploited in Ongoing Cyber Attacks
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Authorities released free decryptor for Phobos and 8base ransomware
  • Missouri Adopts New Data Breach Notice Law
Category: Breach IncidentsMalware

Post navigation

← Anthem agrees to pay $39.5M in latest settlement over 2015 hacking
Ca: Two Telus Health medical service providers pay ransom after 60K client files accessed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Canadian cybercriminal sentenced to a year in prison for NFT theft scheme
  • Oops! Catasauqua employees’ Social Security numbers, other data accidentally sent to government watchdog group
  • EU-wide Breach Notification Template on the Horizon
  • Sex toy maker Lovense caught leaking users’ email addresses and exposing accounts to takeovers
  • Hackers wipe out Rs 384 crore from Bengaluru cryptocurrency firm Neblio Technologies; firm says inside job
  • Intelligence cyberattack on Crimea. Documents confirming abduction of children from Ukraine found
  • Seminole County Schools recovers money taken by hackers
  • Minnesota National Guard deployed; St. Paul declares state of emergency in response to cyberattack
  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Attorney General James Takes Action to Protect Sensitive Personal Information of Tens of Millions of People
  • Searches of Your Private Data in the Cloud Amount to Illicit State Action
  • How a Tax Subpoena in Ohio Tests European Privacy Law
  • Cambodia moves to enact comprehensive data privacy law
  • White House ordered to restore Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood clinics
  • California Attorney General Announces $1.55M CCPA Settlement with Healthline.com
  • Canada’s Bill C-2 Opens the Floodgates to U.S. Surveillance

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.