DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

More details emerge on one of Maze Team’s victims

Posted on February 21, 2020 by Dissent

On January 21 and January 31, this site reported on a ransomware attack by Maze Team on CrossroadsNet or Crossroads Technologies. It wasn’t even clear who was attacked, as one entity had no web site, and none of the Crossroads Technologies entities responded to multiple inquiries by this site about the breach. Then on January 31, we found a notification from Personal Touch Home Care of Greater Portsmouth that shed a bit of light on the attack.

As I noted in that report, it was not clear whether the Portsmouth notification explained the data dumps this site had seen on Maze’s news site. One database was from the Long Island, New York area and the other database was from Michigan.

Today, HHS added 17 entries to its breach tool related to this ransomware attack. The reports were actually submitted to HHS on January 28, but were first listed publicly today. In some cases, it appears that the NY headquarters reported the incident to HHS. In other entries, it appears the local entity filed the report from their state. The following is a list of the latest additions to HHS’s breach tool with the number of patients impacted for each of the entities:

  1. Personal Touch Home Care of Greater Portsmouth – 1957
  2. Personal Touch Home Services of Dallas, Inc. – 1700
  3. Personal Touch Home Care of VA, Inc. – 33324
  4. Personal Touch Home Care of W. VA, Inc. – 1169
  5. Personal Touch Hospice of VA, Inc. – 1657
  6. Personal Touch Home Care of Mass., Inc. – 2015
  7. PT Home Services of San Antonio, Inc. – 5930
  8. Personal Touch Home-Aides, Inc. – 2633
  9. Personal Touch Home Care of S.E. Mass., Inc. – 2863
  10. Personal Touch Home Aides Inc. – 1890
  11. Personal Touch Home Care of PA, Inc. – 9302
  12. Personal Touch Home Care of Ohio, Inc. – 15808
  13. Personal Touch Home Aides of Baltimore, Inc. – 804
  14. Personal Touch Home Care of Baltimore, Inc. – 9058
  15. Personal Touch Home Care of KY, Inc. – 24013
  16. Personal Touch Home Care of Indiana, Inc. – 3593
  17. Personal Touch Home Aides of New York, Inc. – 38693

So far, then, there appear to be at least 156,409 impacted, although it may well be more.

Significantly, perhaps, Crossroads Technologies is no longer listed on Maze’s news site. But Maze has not responded to inquiries asking them if that means that the entity has paid ransom or not. The only data that this site knows was dumped and was likely downloaded by people were the two databases previously reported. But what happened to the rest of the data? Was it dumped or not?


Related:

  • Some lower-tier ransomware gangs have formed a new RaaS alliance -- or have they? (1)
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
Category: Breach IncidentsMalware

Post navigation

← Personal health information of nearly 2,900 Queen’s patients sent to wrong email address
Endeavor Energy Resources notifies employees and dependents after employee fell prey to phishing attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.